There were so many limitations. Here are the important points:
- First of all, of the 21327 participants who were followed over 20 years, only 8 percent ate more than one egg per day. That is a very small cohort. The most important thing to note is that less frequent intake (less than one egg per day) DID NOT INFLUENCE RISK for all-cause mortality. How many of us eat eggs every day?
- The study suffers from lack of detailed dietary information, such as, how were the eggs prepared (fried, scrambled, hard-boiled, in egg salad)? This is extremely important when taking into account all-cause mortality.
- The participants with higher egg intake were older, had higher BMI (body mass index), smoked more cigarettes, drank more alcohol, were less physically active, and had a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes. Think this may have contributed to all-cause mortality?
- Egg consumption in any amount was NOT associated with increased risk of heart attacks, strokes, or cardiovascular disease.
- The authors profess that they did not track the amount of calories and major nutrient intake of the participants, where as other egg studies did.
No comments:
Post a Comment